It took the jury more than 14 hours to choose death on six of the 17
capital counts over life imprisonment for the 21-year-old Muslim former
university student of Chechen descent who came to the United States as a
child.

Boston bombing suspect, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev divulges role
The same 12-member panel convicted him on April 8 on all 30 counts
relating to the April 15, 2013 bombings, the murder of a police officer,
a car jacking and a shootout while on the run.
Three people were killed and 264 others wounded, including 17 who
lost limbs, in the twin blasts near the finish line at the northeastern
city’s popular marathon.
Tsarnaev went on the run and was arrested four days later, hiding and
injured in a grounded boat on which he had scrawled a bloody message
apparently defending the attacks as a means to avenge the US wars in
Iraq and Afghanistan.
Two years later, he stood in a dark blazer with his hands clasped
before him, showing no emotion as the court clerk read from the death
penalty.
The court was silent during the verdict reading.
Government prosecutors called Tsarnaev a remorseless terrorist who
deserves to die for inflicting carnage. The defense said he was a “lost
kid,” manipulated into the “heinous crime” by his radical older brother.
– Death penalty opposition –
Prominent survivors had opposed the death penalty for Tsarnaev, a
teenager at the time, fearing that lengthy appeals would dredge up their
agony.
The federal sentence comes despite widespread opposition to the death
penalty in the state of Massachusetts, where no one has been executed
since 1947.
Survivors, including the parents of the youngest victim
eight-year-old Martin Richard, crammed into the gallery to hear the
verdict.
Since the federal death penalty was reinstated in 1988, only 79
people have been sentenced to die and only three have been executed,
says the Death Penalty Information Center.
Three other death verdicts were turned into life sentences after new trials were granted.
The decision caps a harrowing, more than two-month trial that saw the
court relive the horror of the attacks day after day through grisly
videos and heartbreaking testimony from those who lost limbs and loved
ones.
The attacks shocked the relatively small northeastern city of Boston
and revived fears of terrorism in the United States after the September
11, 2001 strikes on New York, Washington and Pennsylvania.
Tsarnaev’s lawyers admitted his guilt but said he was manipulated
into taking part by his more radical elder brother, 26-year-old Tamerlan
who was shot dead by police on the run.
They deployed dozens of witnesses during a three-week sentencing phase in an attempt to save him from the death penalty.
– Cannot balance the scales –
“Jahar would never have done this but for Tamerlan. The tragedy would
never have occurred but for Tamerlan,” said lawyer Judy Clarke, who has
saved some of America’s most notorious convicts from death.
She appealed on the jury to consider Tsarnaev’s young age, his
brother’s domineering influence, his parents’ return to Russia in 2012,
the affection of his friends and teachers, and his apparent remorse.
“With either option … Tsarnaev dies in prison. The question is when
and how,” she said. “There’s no punishment, not even a death sentence
that can balance the scales.”
She portrayed an impressionable youth fed Al-Qaeda magazines and
lectures by Tamerlan, the true mastermind of the attacks, the ignored
younger son of a mentally ill father and an “intimidating,” radicalized
mother.
Since then, she said, Tsarnaev had expressed genuine remorse during prison visits by a Roman Catholic nun.
But government prosecutors said Tsarnaev is a callous terrorist
living a double life as a pot-smoker enrolled at University of
Massachusetts, Dartmouth.
They say he self-radicalized as early as high school and was
captivated by the teachings of US-Yemen cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, who was
killed in a drone strike in 2011, and pointed to his note justifying the
attacks.
“No remorse, no apology. Those are the words of a terrorist convinced
he has done the right thing,” US assistant attorney Steven Mellin said.
The jury was required to fill out a 24-page, eight-part verdict form
that forced them to weigh a multitude of aggravating and mitigating
factors before pronouncing the final verdict.
No comments:
Post a Comment