Schools under Jonathan: Few gains, many challenges
The Goodluck Jonathan administration is
not new to strikes by organised labour. In fact, strike action was one
of the tools employed on July 1, 2013 by the Academic Staff Union of
Universities to press home its demands.
The strike by ASUU was one that
university students would not forget in a hurry. It lasted for over five
months before its suspension on December 17.
The
lecturers said they embarked on the strike because of the refusal of
the Federal Government to implement the 2009 agreement it reached with
it.
It took series of meetings, appeals and
confrontations before the 169 days strike was suspended. To make the
lecturers return to class, the Federal Government pledged to inject
N1.3tn into public universities between 2013 and 2018.
Besides the injection of N220bn yearly
into the varsities from 2014, the Federal Government promised to
domicile N200bn in a special account at the Central Bank of Nigeria for
the remaining part of the 2013 after the suspension of the strike.
In order to be sure of the government’s
sincerity to the new agreement, leadership of the union demanded among
others a proper monitoring and verification of the N30bn initially
released and provision of N1.3tn for the revitalisation of the
university system from 2013 to 2018.
Stakeholders were yet to heave a sigh of
relief when the President of the National Association of Colleges of
Education Academic Staff Union, Mr. Asagha Nkoro, stated via a
three-page letter dated December 18, 2013 that the union was embarking
on strike barely a day ASUU suspended its own.
In the letter, COEASU submitted that the
Federal Government failed to honour its agreement with the union despite
having a series of talks with it between September and December 2013.
“It is common knowledge that COEASU
leadership had always felt that the talks held so far with government
representatives were well-intentioned. While the government held series
of talks with the union leadership between September and December 2013
(specifically six times; four of which were attended by the appropriate
Minister of Education and also Labour and Productivity), evidences
abound that the government does not wish to keep her side of the bargain
in meeting the understanding reached at such meetings. This, without
equivocation, is unacceptable to our union given the peculiar high
nuisance and volatile nature of the colleges of education sector,” the
letter read.
The strike which lasted for eight months
was later suspended in principle, following the intervention of the
Chairmen of Governing Councils of Federal Colleges of Education.
The leadership of the union explained
that it agreed to persuasions from the governing councils to suspend the
industrial action based on assurances that the outstanding issues would
be resolved.
Besides, the resolutions indicated that
the circular announcing the merger of the lower cadre staff in the COE
would be released quickly and a technical committee inaugurated to
examine other issues.
Apart contending with strike actions, the
Federal Government in the primary and post-primary education introduced
a re-modification of the 9-3-4 system of education to accommodate a new
education policy termed 1-6-3-3-4.
The government had noted that the system
would introduce a one-year Early Childhood Education to five-year-old
pupils before they advance to six-year basic schooling.
The first year in the 1-6-3-3-4 policy indicates that children within age five would be exposed to early education.
Consequently, primary education is for
the six-year structure, while the two three years are for primary and
secondary education while tertiary education will be for four years.
The 9-3-4 policy involves six years of
primary education before pupils undergo a three-year education in junior
secondary school to achieve a nine-year of universal compulsory
learning.
The three-year is for senior secondary
school while tertiary education takes the four-year completing the
structure. Some stakeholders including the Education Rights Campaign
described the development as policy somersault.
In the area of funding, education did not
fare better than other sectors. For instance in 2011, education got
N306.3bn, while other sector received juicy allocations out of the
N4.971tn approved for the year.
In 2012, the sector got N400.15bn
representing 8.43 per cent of the budget, while out of the N4.92tn
budgeted for 2013, N426.53bn went to education.
In 2014, the allocation for the sector was N493bn, representing 10.7 per cent of the N4.6tn budget for the year.
This year, education, however got the
lion’s share of the budget with N392.3bn followed by the military which
received N338.7bn out of the N4.425tn appropriated for the year.
It was not only about strikes, low
allocation and policy introduction; the Jonathan administration also
established federal universities and approved nine private ones.
Some of the approved federal universities
included the Federal University of Birnin-Kebbi, Kebbi State; Federal
University of Gusau, Zamfara State, and Federal University of Gashua,
Yobe State.
The list of the approved private
varsities included Mountain Top University, Ogun State; Chrisland
University, Owode, Ogun State; Christopher University, Mowe, Ogun State;
Hallmark University, Ijebu Itele, Ogun State; Kings University, Ode
Omu, Osun State; Michael and Cecilia Ibru University, Orode, Delta
State; Ritman University, Ikot Ekpene, Akwa Ibom State and Summit
University, Offa, Kwara State and Augustine University, Ilara, Lagos
State.
Just last week, the government also
converted four colleges of education to universities. The affected
colleges of education included the Adeyemi College of Education, Ondo
(now Adeyemi University of Education, Ondo); Federal College of
Education, Kano (now Federal University of Education, Kano); and Alvan
Ikoku College of Education, Owerri (now Alvan Ikoku University of
Education, Owerri) and Federal College of Education, Zaria (now Federal
University of Education, Zaria).
In his reaction to the legacy which the
outgoing administration is leaving behind in the area of education, an
educationist, Dr. Azeez Ademola, said it did well especially for
establishing federal universities.
He added that though the governing
councils of the varsities were constituted late, the government should
be commended for establishing them.
Ademola said, “There were strikes from
ASUU and COEASU when the government reneged on past agreements with the
two unions. In the area of funding, the government did not fare better
even as the spending of internal funds of institutions was not properly
monitored. The impunity witnessed under the administration manifested in
the sector. Generally, the departing government deserves commendation
for also granting university status to four colleges of education in
furtherance of their special training.”
The ERC however described the legacy of
the Jonathan administration in education as missed opportunities for
what it described as its failure to revitalise public education.
Speaking through its National
Coordinator, Mr. Hassan Taiwo, it said the last four years of the
outgoing administration saw enormous increase in revenue arising from
rise in the price of crude oil before the slump.
It stated, “Inspite of this, Nigeria
failed to meet up with any of the six objectives of the Education For
All goals in 2015. Instead, illiteracy increased with latest research
showing about 40 million illiterate Nigerians in 2014.’’
For a lecture in the Department of
English, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Chijioke
Uwasomba, the Jonathan administration should only be commended for
establishing federal universities and granting of licences to
individuals and organisations to own universities.
He said, “Beyond this, I think I am of
the view that the administration’s performance in the area of education
is very low. One will wonder however whether the establishment of more
universities will have more impact on university education.’’
He also said the Jonathan administration
should have returned the era of teacher’s training colleges to support
colleges of education rather than converting four of the latter to
universities.
No comments:
Post a Comment